Simulating the Interaction Between Waves and Breakwaters
This application note is a condensed and adapted version of an article recently published in the journal of the Engineering Association for Offshore and Marine in Italy by Fabio Dentale, E. Pugliese Carratelli, S.D. Russo, and Stefano Mascetti. The first three authors are users at the University of Salerno; Mr. Mascetti is an engineer at XC Engineering, Cantu, Italy. XC Engineering is Flow Science’s associate for Italy.
The design of breakwaters must be based on the full understanding of the interaction of a complex natural system (the sea and shores) with artificial structures (breakwaters). Typically, design work entails extensive physical modelling, which can be quite expensive and time-consuming.
Until recently, the complex aspects of breakwater behavior were considered too challenging for detailed numerical simulations. This is especially the case for breakwaters consisting of rubble mounds composed of blocks of concrete or rocks in which water flows through complex paths with unsteady motion.
The gap between numerical and physical, investigations, has narrowed, thanks to the advancement of computing technology. It is now possible to accurately represent a solid structure consisting of individual blocks which interacts with the flow, so as to create a numerical flow domain within the empty spaces between the blocks. This enables the evaluation of the effect of the full hydrodynamic behaviour, including convective terms, and the effects of turbulence, which cannot be taken into account with the classical Darcy scheme in which the breakwaters are approximated as homogeneous porous media.
Modeling Rubble Mound Breakwaters
The following examples describe cases where rubble mound breakwaters are modelled on the basis of their real geometry, taking into account the hydrodynamic interactions with the wave motion.
Figure 1: Artificial blocks.
The work takes into consideration a schematic representation of a natural stone mound, reproduced as a set of spheres, and was further developed to consider commonly-used artificial blocks such as the cube, the modified cube, the antifer, the tetrapod, the accropode, the accropode II, the coreloc, the xbloc,and the xbloc base (fig. 1).
Figure 2a: Submerged Breakwaters.
Breakwaters, both submerged and emerged, were sized by making use of standard empirical formulas as available in the literature and numerically constructed by overlapping individual blocks following real geometric patterns, modelling the structure as in the full size construction and in the physical modelling (fig.2).
Figures 2b and 2c: Emerged Breakwater - Accropode regular (2b left) & Accropode irregular (2c right).
In order to validate the quality of the proposed procedure, three different geometries were considered for the submerged breakwater: solid, porous, solid-porous (fig. 2a), while for the emerged breakwater, two different geometries were used, according to the shape of the elements: regular and random (fig. 2b - 2c).
Once the breakwaters were defined, the geometric configuration was imported into FLOW-3D and tested for the study of wave propagation in order to assess the hydrodynamic interactions. The simulations were carried out by integrating the Navier-Stokes equations in three dimensions, using the RNG turbulence model and a computational grid with a fine mesh nested inside a larger coarse grid.
For the submerged barrier (calculation domain: 90x1.9x6.5m), the containing mesh block consisted of 46,200 elements of equal size (0.30x0.27x0.30m), while the nested block was located at the breakwater with 2,353,412 elements of equal size (0.061x0.055x0.061m).
Figures 3a and 3b: Mesh views of submerged breakwater (3a above) & emerged breakwater (3b below).
The same criterion was adopted for the emerged breakwater. The containing mesh block consisted of 150,000 elements (0.50x0.20x0.30m) and the nested block was created with 2,025,000 elements (0.10x0.10x0.10m) (fig 3).
Figures 4a: Submerged breakwater.
Some of the results are summarized in the following images. In Fig. 4, the evolution of pressure and turbulent energy along a two-dimensional section of the 3D domain is represented. In Fig. 5, the three-dimensional configurations of the free surface, caught in different moments of time, are shown.
Figures 4b: Emerged Breakwater - Accropode regular.
The variation of the hydrodynamic quantities along the flow paths and along the contour of the individual solid elements of the primary armour are easily detectable. This is most visible in three-dimensional reconstruction of the free surface (Fig.5) where the effects of wave action on the breakwater are represented with greater details.
Figures 5a: Submerged breakwater.
Figures 5b: Emerged Breakwater - Accropode regular.
Figures 5c: Emerged Breakwater - Accropode irregular.
A method utilizing Navier-Stokes-based numerical simulation to provide an accurate representation of the interactions between a maritime structure, either submerged or emerged, and fluid motion has been demonstrated. Simulations were carried out by making use of an advanced computational fluid dynamic software system (FLOW-3D), involving RANS for turbulence simulation and VOF for free surface computation.
The results show that the procedure provides a detailed picture of the fluid motion within the paths among the? blocks, thereby offering a more accurate simulation than the conventional seeping flow methods. In principle, there are no limitations on the possibilities of simulating the structure, both submerged and emerged, in all its relevant parts (filter, core and toe).
Further studies will be aimed at assessing the stability of individual blocks through the use of the General Moving Object model in FLOW-3D.
Submit an Application Note
We're interested in how you're using FLOW-3D. If you have an idea for an application note, please contact Amanda Ruggles.